Wan 2.7 vs Wan 3.0

Alibaba against Alibaba, the same lab's consecutive models. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • Wan 3.0 costs 58% less on price per second ($0.064 against $0.15 per second at the cheapest setting).
  • People prefer Wan 3.0 in blind votes on LMArena's text-to-video arena: rated 1,477 against 1,337 Elo.
  • On the 2 benchmarks both have scores on, Wan 2.7 leads on 0 and Wan 3.0 on 2.
  • Wan 3.0 is newer: listed Aug 24, 2026, against Apr 15, 2026.

Side by side

Wan 2.7Wan 3.0
LabAlibabaAlibaba
ListedApr 15, 2026Aug 24, 2026
Per second, cheapest setting$0.15$0.064
Per second, top setting-$0.26
A typical clip$0.75$0.32
Resolutions720p, 1080p480p, 720p, 1080p
Clip length2 to 10 s2 to 30 s
Opens on your imageYesYes
Follows reference imagesYesYes
Arena rating (LMArena)1,337 Elo1,477 Elo
Measured time to result-343 s

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

BenchmarkWan 2.7Wan 3.0
LMArena: Image to Video1428 EloLMArena1481 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Video1337 EloLMArena1477 EloLMArena

In our tests and guides

Where Wan 2.7 or Wan 3.0 ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The ratings are LMArena's blind human votes, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Alibaba models, Alibaba models, every video model's price and our sources.