Wan 2.7 vs Veo 3.1 Fast

Alibaba against Google. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • They cost the same: $0.15 per second at the cheapest setting.
  • People prefer Veo 3.1 Fast in blind votes on LMArena's text-to-video arena: rated 1,361 against 1,337 Elo.
  • On the 2 benchmarks both have scores on, Wan 2.7 leads on 1 and Veo 3.1 Fast on 1.
  • Veo 3.1 Fast is newer: listed Apr 24, 2026, against Apr 15, 2026.

Side by side

Wan 2.7Veo 3.1 Fast
LabAlibabaGoogle
ListedApr 15, 2026Apr 24, 2026
Per second, cheapest setting$0.15$0.15
Per second, top setting-$0.45
A typical clip$0.75$0.60
Resolutions720p, 1080p720p, 1080p, 4K
Clip length2 to 10 s4 to 8 s
Opens on your imageYesYes
Follows reference imagesYesNo
Arena rating (LMArena)1,337 Elo1,361 Elo

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

BenchmarkWan 2.7Veo 3.1 Fast
LMArena: Image to Video1428 EloLMArena1386 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Video1337 EloLMArena1361 EloLMArena

In our tests and guides

Where Wan 2.7 or Veo 3.1 Fast ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The ratings are LMArena's blind human votes, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Alibaba models, Google models, every video model's price and our sources.