DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

DeepSeek against Xiaomi. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 3.4% less on blended price ($0.79 against $0.82 per 1M tokens, 3 input to 1 output).
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 29.9 against 28.6.
  • On the 12 benchmarks both have scores on, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads on 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro on 9.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro reads more context: 1.1M tokens against 1M.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is newer: listed Oct 17, 2026, against Sep 21, 2026.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LabDeepSeekXiaomi
ListedOct 17, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Input per 1M tokens$0.45$0.65
Output per 1M tokens$1.80$1.30
Cached input per 1M$0.009$0.0054
Blended (3:1) per 1M$0.79$0.82
Context window1M1.1M
Max output393K131K
Knowledge cutoff--
Intelligence index28.629.9
Coding index--
ReasoningYesYes
Reads imagesYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputYesYes

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The indices are the Artificial Analysis indices, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See DeepSeek models, Xiaomi models, every LLM's price and our sources.