Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Wonder

Anthropic against Meta. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • Muse Wonder costs 20% less on blended price ($12.00 against $15.00 per 1M tokens, 3 input to 1 output).
  • Muse Wonder scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 43.3 against 42.
  • On the 15 benchmarks both have scores on, Claude Opus 4.8 leads on 1 and Muse Wonder on 14.
  • Muse Wonder reads more context: 1M tokens against 1M.
  • Muse Wonder is newer: listed Oct 12, 2026, against May 27, 2026.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.8Muse Wonder
LabAnthropicMeta
ListedMay 27, 2026Oct 12, 2026
Input per 1M tokens$7.50$6.00
Output per 1M tokens$37.50$30.00
Cached input per 1M$0.75$0.30
Blended (3:1) per 1M$15.00$12.00
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Knowledge cutoff--
Intelligence index4243.3
Coding index74.3-
ReasoningYesYes
Reads imagesYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputYesYes

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

In our tests and guides

Where Claude Opus 4.8 or Muse Wonder ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The indices are the Artificial Analysis indices, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Anthropic models, Meta models, every LLM's price and our sources.