Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.6

Meta against xAI. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • Grok 4.6 costs 63% less on blended price ($4.50 against $12.00 per 1M tokens, 3 input to 1 output).
  • Grok 4.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 44.4 against 43.3.
  • On the 15 benchmarks both have scores on, Muse Wonder leads on 13 and Grok 4.6 on 2.
  • Muse Wonder reads more context: 1M tokens against 500K.
  • Muse Wonder is newer: listed Oct 12, 2026, against Aug 12, 2026.

Side by side

Muse WonderGrok 4.6
LabMetaxAI
ListedOct 12, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Input per 1M tokens$6.00$3.00
Output per 1M tokens$30.00$9.00
Cached input per 1M$0.30$0.75
Blended (3:1) per 1M$12.00$4.50
Context window1M500K
Max output944K450K
Knowledge cutoff--
Intelligence index43.344.4
Coding index-76.8
ReasoningYesYes
Reads imagesYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputYesYes

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

In our tests and guides

Where Muse Wonder or Grok 4.6 ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The indices are the Artificial Analysis indices, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Meta models, xAI models, every LLM's price and our sources.