Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare

Google against OpenAI. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • They cost the same: $0.058 per image.
  • People prefer GPT Image 2.6 Flare in blind votes on LMArena's text-to-image arena: rated 1,384 against 1,325 Elo.
  • On the 7 benchmarks both have scores on, Nano Banana 2.1 leads on 0 and GPT Image 2.6 Flare on 7.
  • GPT Image 2.6 Flare is newer: listed Nov 4, 2026, against Oct 6, 2026.

Side by side

Nano Banana 2.1GPT Image 2.6 Flare
LabGoogleOpenAI
ListedOct 6, 2026Nov 4, 2026
Per image$0.058$0.058
Edits an image you sendYesYes
Arena rating (LMArena)1,325 Elo1,384 Elo
Measured time to result14 s-

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

BenchmarkNano Banana 2.1GPT Image 2.6 Flare
LMArena: Image Editing1427 EloLMArena1462 EloLMArena
LMArena: Multi-Image Editing1431 EloLMArena1439 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Image1325 EloLMArena1384 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Image (Commercial Design)1328 EloLMArena1374 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Image (Photorealistic)1337 EloLMArena1388 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Image (Portraits)1336 EloLMArena1444 EloLMArena
LMArena: Text to Image (Text Rendering)1360 EloLMArena1403 EloLMArena

In our tests and guides

Where Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT Image 2.6 Flare ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The ratings are LMArena's blind human votes, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Google models, OpenAI models, every image model's price and our sources.