Wan 3.0 vs Wan 3.0 Prime

Alibaba against Alibaba. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • Wan 3.0 costs 38% less on price per second ($0.064 against $0.10 per second at the cheapest setting).
  • Wan 3.0 Prime is newer: listed Aug 27, 2026, against Aug 24, 2026.
  • Measured on GenMagic, Wan 3.0 took a median 337 seconds to a finished clip and Wan 3.0 Prime 153.

Side by side

Wan 3.0Wan 3.0 Prime
LabAlibabaAlibaba
ListedAug 24, 2026Aug 27, 2026
Per second, cheapest setting$0.064$0.10
Per second, top setting$0.26$0.42
A typical clip$0.32$0.51
Resolutions480p, 720p, 1080p480p, 720p, 1080p
Clip length2 to 30 s2 to 30 s
Opens on your imageYesYes
Follows reference imagesYesNo
Arena rating (LMArena)1,476 EloNot rated
Measured time to result337 s153 s

In our tests and guides

Where Wan 3.0 or Wan 3.0 Prime ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The ratings are LMArena's blind human votes, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Alibaba models, Alibaba models, every video model's price and our sources.