Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra

Anthropic against OpenAI. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • Claude Fable 5.2 costs 20% less on blended price ($24.00 against $30.00 per 1M tokens, 3 input to 1 output).
  • Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 64.6 against 56.9.
  • On the 13 benchmarks both have scores on, Claude Fable 5.2 leads on 9 and GPT-6 Astra on 2, with 2 tied.
  • GPT-6 Astra reads more context: 1.1M tokens against 1M.
  • Claude Fable 5.2 is newer: listed Nov 9, 2026, against Sep 4, 2026.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6 Astra
LabAnthropicOpenAI
ListedNov 9, 2026Sep 4, 2026
Input per 1M tokens$12.00$15.00
Output per 1M tokens$60.00$75.00
Cached input per 1M$0.30$1.50
Blended (3:1) per 1M$24.00$30.00
Context window1M1.1M
Max output128K128K
Knowledge cutoff--
Intelligence index64.656.9
Coding index-76.9
ReasoningYesYes
Reads imagesYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputYesYes

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

In our tests and guides

Where Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT-6 Astra ran on a real brief, or shows in a live table.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The indices are the Artificial Analysis indices, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Anthropic models, OpenAI models, every LLM's price and our sources.