Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Anthropic against Google. Prices, scores and speed below are live.

  • Gemini 4 Carbon costs 75% less on blended price ($6.00 against $24.00 per 1M tokens, 3 input to 1 output).
  • Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 64.6 against 60.
  • On the 9 benchmarks both have scores on, Claude Fable 5.2 leads on 7 and Gemini 4 Carbon on 2.
  • Gemini 4 Carbon reads more context: 1M tokens against 1M.
  • Gemini 4 Carbon is newer: listed Nov 10, 2026, against Nov 9, 2026.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5.2Gemini 4 Carbon
LabAnthropicGoogle
ListedNov 9, 2026Nov 10, 2026
Input per 1M tokens$12.00$3.00
Output per 1M tokens$60.00$15.00
Cached input per 1M$0.30$0.15
Blended (3:1) per 1M$24.00$6.00
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Knowledge cutoff--
Intelligence index64.660
Coding index--
ReasoningYesYes
Reads imagesYesYes
Tool useYesYes
Structured outputYesYes

Every benchmark both are scored on

Each model's best score per benchmark, with its source. Scores from different sources or settings are not always comparable; each links to where it was published.

More comparisons

Where these figures come from

Prices are GenMagic's own, what the studio and the API charge, recomputed from each provider's price list every few minutes. The indices are the Artificial Analysis indices, and every benchmark score links to its source, re-read daily. Measured speed is GenMagic's own generation records, in aggregate. See Anthropic models, Google models, every LLM's price and our sources.